363 Miles Across the State of New York
Ann Kraeger
Kim Rush
HIST 101 US History to 1877
17 May 2010
At the beginning of the 1800’s America was still a very young nation. Although the industrial revolution was beginning to take hold in England, America suffered one major obstacle to her own industrialization, expensive and unreliable transportation. States such as New York were found to be fertile and well suited to the growing of crops, the milling of flour, and the cutting of timber, but she was lacking reliable and inexpensive means of moving these products to markets on the eastern seaboard. At the turn of the century the Appalachian Mountains were seen as the barrier that stood between the populous eastern seaboard and westward expansion into the interior of New York State and beyond the Great Lakes.1 Prior to the building of the Erie Canal anyone traveling across the state was bumped along in “bone-rattling” wagons that were drawn by horses over rough roads called corduroy roads because of the logs that were laid, side by side, across them. In good weather the roads were dry and dusty and in wet weather the roads were a quagmire of mud and ruts.2 making matters worse, the cost of hauling freight overland was more expensive than by water. The cost of moving a ton of freight from Albany to Geneva, 200 miles, in 1798 was $100 a ton overland, while the cost of moving the same amount over the same distance by water was only $32.3 A solution needed to be found to facilitate the expansion of settlers westward into the interior of New York State and to help those who were already settled west of the Appalachians to be able to have quicker and cheaper access to the goods and markets of the east. That solution came in the form of the Erie Canal, or at the time that it was being proposed and built, “Clinton’s Ditch.”4 The next question then becomes, could this be done both economically and geographically. Could the money be raised for such an undertaking and, more importantly, did the geography of New York State lend itself to a route that would allow for the building of a canal. These two questions were not only what needed to be answered but the answers needed to be presented to the Legislature and voters of New York State.
Before a canal could be built a route had to be surveyed across the state. Several prospective routes were proposed by many different and prominent politicians and businessmen of the time. However, in 1810 the then gubernatorial candidate, Jonas Platt came up with the “visionary and extravagant” idea to survey “the whole route from the Hudson to Lake Ontario and to Lake Erie also.”5 According to Jonas Platt this was not to be a canal running in existing streams but rather independent of rivers, using them as feeders instead. It would be completely man-made using locks and levels and existing waterways to supply the water for the canal only. The route of the canal would be decided by the survey. Platt also proposed that the plan be backed by De Witt Clinton Republican Leader of the senate.6 The resolution was passes, the senate appropriated monies to pay for the survey and by virtue of politics De Witt Clinton came to be associated with the Erie Canal.
The following year, April 1811, the survey report was presented before the state senate along with “An Act to provide for the Improvements of the Internal Navigation of the State” which passed the legislature.7 A suitable route had been found, the next big hurdle that had to be overcome was funding. Even though a route had been found did not mean that there was no opposition to the project. Thomas Jefferson said that, “making a canal 350 miles through a wilderness is little short of madness.”8 Not only did Thomas Jefferson oppose the project but President James Madison vetoed a bill that would have provided federal land grants to help New York with the project.9 Nevertheless, Governor De Witt Clinton and the voters of New York weren’t discouraged by these denials by the federal government and they persisted in finding the backing for their project. Riding on the Clinton and the canal Board of Commissioners’ conviction, plans for the Erie Canal went ahead. March 18, 1817 legislation was introduced that proposed a $1.5 million dollar appropriation to start construction on a short section of the canal. The passed the Assembly (64-36), then on April 15, 1817 the Senate passed the Canal Bill (18-9).10 The battle to build the canal was over and the fight had been won, construction began on July 4, 1817. New Yorkers would have their canal insuring easier and cheaper travel from New York City to the interior of the state and beyond to Lake Erie.
Before the Canal was proposed and built there were no engineering schools in America and even if there had been, the technology that went into the building of this wonder hadn’t even been thought of yet. The Erie Canal is a man-made waterway stretching 363 miles long across the breadth of New York State connecting Albany in the east, crossing the Appalachian Mountains and connecting with Buffalo on Lake Erie in the west.11 The canal was a mere 40 feet wide and 4 feet deep but for the times it was considered a miracle of technology. The miracle existed in the marvel of its 83 locks which raised boats and freight an elevation of 675 feet as they made their way across the hills and valleys of New York State.
Fig.1. Profile Map of the Erie Canal: this map shows the rise in elevation from the Hudson River in the East to Lake Erie in the west.
Source: Sadowski, Frank E.. "The Erie Canal." 2000.http://www.eriecanal.org/maps.html (accessed 22 May 2010).5.

Not only did the canal have to overcome such a great elevation but there were many other engineering feats that had to be accomplished before the canal could be realized and be called a success. “Success fed progress and the pace of construction increased…two years before its completion with construction underway in the west, construction on the eastern section commenced, and engineering feats like locks and aqueducts sprung up across the state.”12
Figure 2. Source: Vintage Views of Rochester New York." 2003.http://www.vintageviews.org/vv-r/index.htm (accessed 22 May2010).
The building of the double locks at Lockport, New York.
Figure 3, Source: Volpe, Paul. "Digging Clinton's Ditch. 2003.http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA02/volpe/canal/firstpage.html (accessed 18 May 2010), 4.
Not only were there many engineering marvels that came about because of the building of the canal but the economy of the state was immediately impacted, long before the canal was completed or opened for business. By 1820 the middle section of the canal was completed and filled with water. Even though it was only a portion of the whole canal, the use of that part of it had already brought prosperity to the area. By that time New York’s population had increased so much that it had reached the standing of the nation’s largest state. Already businesses for boat building and other necessities for the canal had sprung up along the already opened section of the canal.13 The entire canal was completed in 1825. In its first full season, 1825-1826, $750,000 was collected in tolls. Stores sprang up all along the canal selling almost anything a boat or its passengers might need making the canal a positive thing for the economy of the State of New York.14
The impact that the canal had on the state is visible on any map that you look at even today. Except for the cities of Elmira and Binghamton every major city in the state of New York is situated along the canal.15 Although the canal is no longer used commercially as much as it was, it is still popular for recreational boaters and the towpaths along the canal is a great place for walkers and bikers alike. The state of New York is still prospering as a result of the building of the Erie Canal and still enjoying the presence of the canal in the lives of her citizens.
.
Notes
1. Volpe, Paul. "Digging Clinton's Ditch." 2003.http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA02/volpe/canal/firstpage.html (accessed 18 May 2010), 3.
2. Kendall, Martha. The Erie Canal. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2008, 8-9.
3. Bernstein, Peter L.. Wedding of the Waters. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2005, 99.
4. Koeppel, Gerard. Bond of Union. Cambridge: Da Capo Press, 2009, 8.
5. Koeppel, Bond of Union. 72.
6. Ibid., 73.
7. Ibid., 88.
8. Mintz, S.. "The Roots of American Economic Growth."
2007.http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/database/article_display.cfm?HHID=600 (accessed 21 May
2010), 2.
Figure 1. Sadowski, Frank E.. "The Erie Canal." 2000.http://www.eriecanal.org/maps.html (accessed 22 May
2010).5.
9. Mintz, S., “The Roots of American Economic Growth.” 2010, 2.
10. Volpe, “Digging Clinton’s Ditch.” 2003, 4.
11. Kendall, The Erie Canal, 2008, 7.
12. Volpe, “Digging Clinton’s Ditch.” 2003,4.
Figure 2. Source: Vintage Views of Rochester New York." 2003.http://www.vintageviews.org/vv-r/index.htm
accessed 22 May2010).
Figure 3, Source: Volpe, Paul. "Digging Clinton's Ditch.
2003.http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA02/volpe/canal/firstpage.html (accessed 18 May 2010), 4.
13. Kendall, Martha. The Erie Canal. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2008, 46.
14. Ibid., 84.
15. Ibid., 114-115.
Bibliography
Bernstein, Peter L.. Wedding of the Waters. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2005
Kendall, Martha. The Erie Canal. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2008.
Koeppel, Gerard. Bond of Union. Cambridge: Da Capo Press, 2009.
Mintz, S.. "The Roots of American Economic Growth."
2007.http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/database/article_display.cfm?HHID=600 (accessed 21 May 2010).
Sadowski, Frank E.. "The Erie Canal." 2000.http://www.eriecanal.org/maps.html (accessed 22 May 2010).
Seward, William H.. "The Building of the Erie CanalHistoryCentral.com (2000), 1,
http://www.historycentral.com/documents/EirieCanal.html. (accessed May 22, 2010).
Volpe, Paul. "Digging Clinton's Ditch." 2003.http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA02/volpe/canal/firstpage.html (accessed
18 May 2010).
Recent Comments